Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J S's avatar

It’s hard to take AW’s (re: New Balance) statement on inclusivity and accessibility as genuine when the brand spent over $9 million (in 2024 alone) on solely republican candidates.

I say this as, what I think is uniquely, an American problem with the supreme court’s decision on Citizen’s United. Giving corporations the same rights as a person under the first amendment and allowing millions of dollars to be funneled into political campaigns by brands is only going to continue to erode our (the US’s) democracy.

Expand full comment
runner drew's avatar

I would love to get coffee and talk about this more. I enjoy your writing, thank you.

Running is so deeply personal that to consider branding a running community for the sake of getting something for free (the words I heard), seems like the greatest sellout.

I deliberately choose to run with a friend or two from time to time, and do not belong to a running group. Most of the time I run alone. I cherish both experiences. My “community” shows up in these moments, even when I run solo, as I often see other runners on my runs, and we wave and keep moving.

At events, the spark of community is also special, and I recognize my privilege to afford such luxuries. Brands that I love and brands I don’t use are always represented at these events and while I’m glad they’re there, I also know that it is mainly to create awareness and also to help support events, all to create new/more consumers.

We need the brands, don’t get me wrong, but we will quickly lose the personal connection to this sport if we fall prey to the commercial.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts