Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bhumi's avatar

I take up so many issues with AI (destroying critical thinking skills, the environment, etc. etc.) but I use Runna because I find it's interface accessible and because I can't afford a human coach (yet!). I think there can be problems with AI training programs, but there are simultaneously problems with individuals listening to their own bodies, or not. We live in such a techno-focused world that I tend to focus on what I see as a bigger issue: that humans are losing the ability to listen to ourselves - we're inundated with fitness influencers saying we need collagen, and our cortisol is too high, and we suck at eating, and we should be on GLP-1s, we should drink tart cherry juice to sleep, etc. that most people aren't really listening to their bodies and what feels good...I realize the listening to self is an entirely different article topic, but when I hear about people getting injured via AI training programs, the root (at least in my circles) is following the plan without checking in with oneself. Not everyone, but most people have internal signals if things aren't going right!

Expand full comment
Allison's avatar

I'm a Runna user and I haven't been injured this year, but I also make adjustments to the plan as needed. I let it push me when it feels reasonable, but I forget about suggested paces and mileage if it doesn't. I'm mostly using Runna as a training plan framework so that I can remove the mental load of making a training plan and feel reasonably prepared for my races. But, my goals are slow and steady improvement and finishing well. If I had more aggressive pacing goals or something, I might hire an actual human.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts